I think there are TOO MANY Muslims in American prisons

Discussion:

(too old to reply)

Knifefight Afterdance

2010-10-05 14:43:59 UTC

BREAKING NEWS..............

Faisal Shahzad sentenced to life in prison for botched Times Sq. car
bombing.

------------------

Please explain why the death penalty wasn't given to this Muslim savage.

lab~rat >:-)

2010-10-05 15:14:16 UTC

Permalink

On 5 Oct 2010 16:43:59 +0200, "Knifefight Afterdance"

Post by Knifefight Afterdance
BREAKING NEWS..............
Faisal Shahzad sentenced to life in prison for botched Times Sq. car
bombing.
------------------
Please explain why the death penalty wasn't given to this Muslim savage.

Because the Obama administration skillfully thwarted this terrorist
attack.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Nathan Bedford Forrest

2010-10-23 22:19:11 UTC

Permalink

Post by lab~rat >:-)
On 5 Oct 2010 16:43:59 +0200, "Knifefight Afterdance"

Because the Obama administration skillfully thwarted this terrorist
attack.

BWAHAHAHAHA

The dumb bastard couldn't make a bomb correctly is the only
reason hundreds weren't killed. Odumbo was busy playing
golf or eating lobster, on the taxpayer dime.

Mullah Fuqu'ar

2010-10-24 02:25:52 UTC

Permalink

Post by Nathan Bedford Forrest

Post by lab~rat >:-)
On 5 Oct 2010 16:43:59 +0200, "Knifefight Afterdance"

Because the Obama administration skillfully thwarted this terrorist
attack.

BWAHAHAHAHA
The dumb bastard couldn't make a bomb correctly is the only
reason hundreds weren't killed. Odumbo was busy playing
golf or eating lobster, on the taxpayer dime.

In response to " I think there are TOO MANY Muslims in American
prisons", many convicts become Muslim converts. It is the religion of
the ex-con and future terrorist.

~~~~~

What is MSNBC's official term for Muslim terrorists?

"Victims".

thinbluemime

2010-10-05 15:43:53 UTC

Permalink

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:43:59 -0400, Knifefight Afterdance

Because this highly trained terrorist and bomb making expert incorrectly
used cow shit and fire crackers for his weapon of mass destruction.

This is some bad shit man.
Loading Image...

250 pounds (113 kg) of urea-based fertilizer in 8 plastic bags and 120
M-88s.

The maker of the "bomb" incorrectly surmised that the urea/sugar mixture
fertilizer would work like the ammonium nitrate-based fertilizer which was
used in the Oklahoma City bombing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Times_Square_car_bomb_attempt

--
http://www.lostdude.com

cloud dreamer

2010-10-05 15:37:31 UTC

Permalink

Post by thinbluemime
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:43:59 -0400, Knifefight Afterdance

Learn the law.

Post by thinbluemime
Because this highly trained terrorist and bomb making expert incorrectly
used cow shit and fire crackers for his weapon of mass destruction.
This is some bad shit man.
http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/Up-In-Smoke-Car.jpg
250 pounds (113 kg) of urea-based fertilizer in 8 plastic bags and 120
M-88s.
The maker of the "bomb" incorrectly surmised that the urea/sugar mixture
fertilizer would work like the ammonium nitrate-based fertilizer which
was used in the Oklahoma City bombing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Times_Square_car_bomb_attempt

Just imagine. The Obama administration brought a terrorist to justice in
less than a year while Bush's terrorists remain in legal limbo up to a
decade later.

..

Knifefight Afterdance

2010-10-05 15:45:29 UTC

Permalink

Post by cloud dreamer

Post by thinbluemime
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:43:59 -0400, Knifefight Afterdance

Post by Knifefight Afterdance
BREAKING NEWS..............
Faisal Shahzad sentenced to life in prison for botched Times Sq.
car bombing.
------------------
Please explain why the death penalty wasn't given to this Muslim savage.

Learn the law.

As usual, you got nothing.

Post by cloud dreamer

Post by thinbluemime
Because this highly trained terrorist and bomb making expert
incorrectly used cow shit and fire crackers for his weapon of mass
destruction.
This is some bad shit man.
http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/Up-In-Smoke-Car.jpg
250 pounds (113 kg) of urea-based fertilizer in 8 plastic bags and
120 M-88s.
The maker of the "bomb" incorrectly surmised that the urea/sugar
mixture fertilizer would work like the ammonium nitrate-based
fertilizer which was used in the Oklahoma City bombing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Times_Square_car_bomb_attempt

Just imagine.

Let's try to do just that. You are outnumbered. lol

Post by cloud dreamer
The Obama administration brought a terrorist to justice
in less than a year while Bush's terrorists remain in legal limbo up
to a decade later.

All of them?

Are you sure about that?

Why are you so stupid? lol

thinbluemime

2010-10-05 15:58:33 UTC

Permalink

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:43:53 -0400, thinbluemime =

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:43:59 -0400, Knifefight Afterdance =

ge.

Because this highly trained terrorist and bomb making expert incorrect=

ly =

used cow shit and fire crackers for his weapon of mass destruction.

Wannabe a terrorist? You can, with $2.52 worth of M-88.
http://www.usfireworks.biz/items/1213a.htm

Can M-88 Firecrackers cause an explosion?
http://www.usfireworks.biz/m-88_firecracker.htm

Good work, FBI, CIA and der Homeland Security, I feel safer now.
Loading Image...

M-88s firecrackers and silver salutes (and M-150s, M-1000, etc.) are not=
=

to be confused with M-80s. M-80s, Cherry Bombs, and other large =

explosives were banned in the USA in 1966 and sale or possession is a =

serious crime.

The M-150=E2=80=99s and other firecrackers and fireworks sold on this we=
bsite are =

all in compliance with US DOT and CPSC regulations and therefore the =

firecrackers contain no more then 50 milligrams of powder. That is not =
=

much, 50 milligrams =3D 0.002 Ounces. They are still great fun and make =
a =

nice bang, which is they are designed to do.

Because of the limited powder content, these devices will NOT cause an =

explosion. Even if bundled together, these devices will not explode as =
=

one. They will not blow a hole in thick plastic or create a fire.

-- =

http://www.lostdude.com

lab~rat >:-)

2010-10-05 16:30:20 UTC

Permalink

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:58:33 -0400, thinbluemime

Post by thinbluemime

Post by thinbluemime
Because this highly trained terrorist and bomb making expert incorrectly
used cow shit and fire crackers for his weapon of mass destruction.

Wannabe a terrorist? You can, with $2.52 worth of M-88.
http://www.usfireworks.biz/items/1213a.htm

Whatever happened to cherry bombs and M-80s?
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

lab~rat >:-)

2010-10-05 16:29:24 UTC

Permalink

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:43:53 -0400, thinbluemime

Post by thinbluemime
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:43:59 -0400, Knifefight Afterdance

Because this highly trained terrorist and bomb making expert incorrectly
used cow shit and fire crackers for his weapon of mass destruction.
This is some bad shit man.
http://stash.norml.org/wp-content/uploads/Up-In-Smoke-Car.jpg
250 pounds (113 kg) of urea-based fertilizer in 8 plastic bags and 120
M-88s.
The maker of the "bomb" incorrectly surmised that the urea/sugar mixture
fertilizer would work like the ammonium nitrate-based fertilizer which was
used in the Oklahoma City bombing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Times_Square_car_bomb_attempt

This guy is still breathing air as the liberals kill unborn babies.
Go figure...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Mr.B1ack

2010-10-05 21:50:30 UTC

Permalink

Because he was a stupid fuck-up and didn't manage to
kill anything but his car.

IMHO, mere "intent" isn't enough to rate a death
penalty except maybe in a serious case of treason.

There's also the continuing problem that 'terrorism',
especially religious jihadism, doesn't fit neatly into
any of our little labled boxes down at the courthouse.
Criminal, soldier or freedom-fighter ? All and neither.
A stickie-wickie. Better to play it cool.

lab~rat >:-)

2010-10-06 12:36:05 UTC

Permalink

Post by Mr.B1ack
IMHO, mere "intent" isn't enough to rate a death
penalty except maybe in a serious case of treason.

And killing thousands of Americans doesn't qualify?
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Mr.B1ack

2010-10-06 13:30:31 UTC

Permalink

Post by lab~rat >:-)

Post by Mr.B1ack
IMHO, mere "intent" isn't enough to rate a death
penalty except maybe in a serious case of treason.

And killing thousands of Americans doesn't qualify?

Actually no. "Treason" implies acting on behalf
of a hostile foreign GOVERNMENT ... but these
jihadists are non-governmental or extra-governmental.
I suppose you could declare Allah to be a "hostile
power" ... but bear in mind Allah is also the
JudeoChristian deity, simply by another name so
there might be a few complaints.

We're back to the problem of there being no
appropriate legal category for jihadists and
political terrorists. The idea of waging war
"for god" has become too far removed from the
western consciousness now ... neither civil
or military law completely describes what a
jihadist is or specifies appropriate sanctions
for what such individuals may do.

"Murder", aside from accidents/passions, is
assumed to be for some kind of personal gain
be it financial, political or emotional. But
jihadists aren't in it for themselves. When
they kill it's for a "higher power". When
political terrorists kill it's for "a
higher principle". Both theoretically benifit
ALL rather than just the killer or some small
group.

Jihadists are nothing really new ... so I can
only presume that western politicos and lawyers
have avoided creating a special category ON PURPOSE.
Exactly what that purpose may be ... hard to say,
but it has created a lot of problems. Even Obama
isn't sure what to do with the Gitmo 'detainees'.
Are they 'soldiers' ? Sort of. Are they 'criminals' ?
Sort of. Are they nutters ? Sort of.

lab~rat >:-)

2010-10-06 13:37:33 UTC

Permalink

Post by Mr.B1ack

Post by lab~rat >:-)

Post by Mr.B1ack
IMHO, mere "intent" isn't enough to rate a death
penalty except maybe in a serious case of treason.

And killing thousands of Americans doesn't qualify?

Actually no. "Treason" implies acting on behalf
of a hostile foreign GOVERNMENT ... but these
jihadists are non-governmental or extra-governmental.
I suppose you could declare Allah to be a "hostile
power" ... but bear in mind Allah is also the
JudeoChristian deity, simply by another name so
there might be a few complaints.
We're back to the problem of there being no
appropriate legal category for jihadists and
political terrorists. The idea of waging war
"for god" has become too far removed from the
western consciousness now ... neither civil
or military law completely describes what a
jihadist is or specifies appropriate sanctions
for what such individuals may do.
"Murder", aside from accidents/passions, is
assumed to be for some kind of personal gain
be it financial, political or emotional. But
jihadists aren't in it for themselves. When
they kill it's for a "higher power". When
political terrorists kill it's for "a
higher principle". Both theoretically benifit
ALL rather than just the killer or some small
group.
Jihadists are nothing really new ... so I can
only presume that western politicos and lawyers
have avoided creating a special category ON PURPOSE.
Exactly what that purpose may be ... hard to say,
but it has created a lot of problems. Even Obama
isn't sure what to do with the Gitmo 'detainees'.
Are they 'soldiers' ? Sort of. Are they 'criminals' ?
Sort of. Are they nutters ? Sort of.

They seriously may want to reconsider. And while they're at it, they
should look into redefining "giving aid and comfort to the enemy"...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Mr.B1ack

2010-10-06 15:24:49 UTC

Permalink

Post by lab~rat >:-)

Post by Mr.B1ack

Post by lab~rat >:-)

Post by Mr.B1ack
IMHO, mere "intent" isn't enough to rate a death
penalty except maybe in a serious case of treason.

And killing thousands of Americans doesn't qualify?

Actually no. "Treason" implies acting on behalf
of a hostile foreign GOVERNMENT ... but these
jihadists are non-governmental or extra-governmental.
I suppose you could declare Allah to be a "hostile
power" ... but bear in mind Allah is also the
JudeoChristian deity, simply by another name so
there might be a few complaints.
We're back to the problem of there being no
appropriate legal category for jihadists and
political terrorists. The idea of waging war
"for god" has become too far removed from the
western consciousness now ... neither civil
or military law completely describes what a
jihadist is or specifies appropriate sanctions
for what such individuals may do.
"Murder", aside from accidents/passions, is
assumed to be for some kind of personal gain
be it financial, political or emotional. But
jihadists aren't in it for themselves. When
they kill it's for a "higher power". When
political terrorists kill it's for "a
higher principle". Both theoretically benifit
ALL rather than just the killer or some small
group.
Jihadists are nothing really new ... so I can
only presume that western politicos and lawyers
have avoided creating a special category ON PURPOSE.
Exactly what that purpose may be ... hard to say,
but it has created a lot of problems. Even Obama
isn't sure what to do with the Gitmo 'detainees'.
Are they 'soldiers' ? Sort of. Are they 'criminals' ?
Sort of. Are they nutters ? Sort of.

They seriously may want to reconsider. And while they're at it, they
should look into redefining "giving aid and comfort to the enemy"...

Of course if you turn fighting "for gawd" into
a special category of crime ... well ... even
US commanders regularly evoke 'god' to motivate
the troops and/or justify campaigns. Hard to
write a law in the USA saying "fighting for
any god EXCEPT LOCALLY POPULAR ONES is a crime".